Actually, it all started when I was asked to talk about taboo topics again (who'd have thought?), so I decided to split it up and do one version for students and one for professional music therapists.
Here's where I was hoping to head with the student version ("Taboo Topics in Music Therapy: What They Didn't Mention in School"):
Music therapy training often focuses on helping students to develop techniques and skills in order to support clients’ goals and objectives. It is only when we begin to work, first in field experiences, then in internships and eventually professionally, that we realize there are some topics that weren’t really addressed in our training. How on earth do we deal with clients who masturbate openly in the middle of music therapy sessions? What is the appropriate professional way to work with a client who has a crush on us? What if we are sexually attracted to one of our clients? How do we manage and come to terms with being a music therapist when we are coping with our own mental illness? What is the best course of action when we are dealing with a client who pushes all of our buttons?
These are the kinds of questions student music therapists ask themselves every day, and the answers aren’t always readily available in journals, conferences, in listserv discussions, or even in life.
As therapists we are taught: what we repress we project. Without a safe space within which to bring up such topics, and without support and guidance from mentors, clinical supervisors or peers, music therapists run the risk of acting out their shame and discomfort. This can lead to burnout or, worse, unethical behavior.
The focus of this participatory workshop will be on providing a forum for student music therapists to give voice to their experiences and to have their concerns validated. This year we will dig a little deeper into why these issues aren’t being talked about and try to come up with some constructive ways we can use to figure out how to get the support we need to address the difficult topics.
The five-hour workshop will be a bit more intense (as it ought to be), and it's geared (of course) to professional music therapists. I don't know about you folks, but remember when I asked what your thoughts were about doing a follow-up workshop? Well, as I looked over "The List (So Far)" I realized that out of 33 items, something like thirty of them (seriously! Thirty!) were related to the therapy relationship in some way, shape, or form!
So.
I decided to go for it and do a CMTE (yes, a whole five hours) where we get to look at the therapy relationship (this one is called "Taboo Topics in Music Therapy: The Intimate Connection Between Therapists and Clients"). Here's the plan of action for the workshop:
The relationship between therapists and their clients is an intimate one. When we add music, the level of intimacy increases. As with any relationship, as the level of intimacy increases, the levels of resistance, uncertainty, and investment also increase- on both the therapist’s part as well as that of the client. On the one hand we may put up unconscious barriers, preventing a deeper connection with our clients. On the other, we may become so merged as to be in danger of violating important therapeutic boundaries. As such, the music therapy relationship can become difficult to negotiate.
In this interactive workshop we will begin by defining countertransference. Using case examples, we will work toward an understanding of: What is it? Where does it come from? How does it affect therapy? How do we begin to identify and use countertransference in our work with clients?
Participants will then be invited to share some of the difficult aspects from their own work with particular clients that challenge them in some way. Through dialogue, journaling and music-making we will process and explore some of the following questions: What are some of the ways we use to avoid looking more deeply at some of the clinical challenges we face as professional music therapists? What are some of the beliefs and ideas we, consciously or unconsciously, hold about ourselves, about music therapy, about our clients? And how do these ideas and beliefs affect our work and our clients? Why are certain topics so difficult to bring up in sessions- even if we know our clients need us to do so? What is it about the topics? What is it about our beliefs, ideas that makes it scary? What kinds of messages are being communicated by us to our clients when we don’t address difficult issues?
Through these workshop experiences, participants will work toward developing the skill of self-reflection, using a variety of techniques to process thoughts and reactions that emerge in relationship to their clients.
So.
I decided to go for it and do a CMTE (yes, a whole five hours) where we get to look at the therapy relationship (this one is called "Taboo Topics in Music Therapy: The Intimate Connection Between Therapists and Clients"). Here's the plan of action for the workshop:
The relationship between therapists and their clients is an intimate one. When we add music, the level of intimacy increases. As with any relationship, as the level of intimacy increases, the levels of resistance, uncertainty, and investment also increase- on both the therapist’s part as well as that of the client. On the one hand we may put up unconscious barriers, preventing a deeper connection with our clients. On the other, we may become so merged as to be in danger of violating important therapeutic boundaries. As such, the music therapy relationship can become difficult to negotiate.
In this interactive workshop we will begin by defining countertransference. Using case examples, we will work toward an understanding of: What is it? Where does it come from? How does it affect therapy? How do we begin to identify and use countertransference in our work with clients?
Participants will then be invited to share some of the difficult aspects from their own work with particular clients that challenge them in some way. Through dialogue, journaling and music-making we will process and explore some of the following questions: What are some of the ways we use to avoid looking more deeply at some of the clinical challenges we face as professional music therapists? What are some of the beliefs and ideas we, consciously or unconsciously, hold about ourselves, about music therapy, about our clients? And how do these ideas and beliefs affect our work and our clients? Why are certain topics so difficult to bring up in sessions- even if we know our clients need us to do so? What is it about the topics? What is it about our beliefs, ideas that makes it scary? What kinds of messages are being communicated by us to our clients when we don’t address difficult issues?
Through these workshop experiences, participants will work toward developing the skill of self-reflection, using a variety of techniques to process thoughts and reactions that emerge in relationship to their clients.
But I'm wondering if maybe this topic is too taboo. So far I've only got three people signed up (and it's happening in a little over two weeks). When I consulted with a psychiatrist friend to ask her if she thought I ought to cancel if our group was so small she (wisely, I think) pointed out that doing so would convey to people that the subject should and would remain a taboo- never to be looked at by music therapists.
So, I'm kind of thinking I'd like to go for it. A small but mighty little group can do amazing things, I imagine.
I'd be curious to hear if you folks out in blog-reading land have any thoughts about this. Do you think I ought to cancel the whole schmear? Might this topic actually be a little too close to home for people?